Separate the boat from the crew.
FleetEdge Team Diagnostic · Planned
Planned product · specimen: an anonymized campaign against its archetype peers. The product is planned; the method is FleetEdge’s live crew/boat decomposition. The sample screen further down is illustrative — sample data, not the published record.
Separate what the boat gave you from what the crew earned — a private diagnostic for your campaign.
For racing teams, tacticians, campaign managers, and coaches. Access by request.
Universe: one boat — yours Story: ORC Worlds 2025, Tallinn Private to your team
Scope: one boat — yours
Visible to: your team only — no other team, federation, or public surface can see this view
Access: by request — the product opens once your access is granted.
The campaign view, on screen.
Your season against the rivals you actually race: the competitor-by-event map, the three-pillar decomposition of every result, the stack-rank that separates boats beating you on the platform from boats beating you on execution — and the scenario planner for the next event.
Team Diagnostic, over the one App.
The same FleetEdge App every product runs on, curated to a competitive team: your boat at full private depth, the rivals you meet across the season at comparison depth, and the crew pillar you actually control front and center.
Competitor × event map
Pin the boats you race and see PPI for every one, event after event — where you lead, where you trail, and against whom.
Three-pillar decomposition
Physics potential, condition fit, and the crew-execution residual — confidence-tiered, with a reason chain. The private depth is on your own boat.
Stack-rank & compare
Sort the field by overall PPI or by the crew pillar alone, per event or per season — platform gaps and execution gaps, separated.
Prepare for the next event
Set the expected conditions and a target rival, then explore sail-plan crossovers across the wind range, plus a crew-weight what-if. Directional guidance to plan against.
Wind-regime affinity
Where your boat’s edge lives across the wind regimes — and how that overlaps with the venues you race.
Your season on the record
Headlines, story cards, and the boat detail for every event you sailed — the published record your private read sits on.
Every panel above runs on instruments already live in the FleetEdge App: Boat detail Crew PPI · three pillars Dimension stack ranking Competitor context Wind-regime affinity Archetypes × conditions Fleet scatter Headlines Story cards
Deliberately not here: a rival’s private workspace — competitors appear at comparison depth from the same published results anyone can see, and you never see their what-ifs. Not one event — bound-to-one-event is Event Pack’s lane; this view crosses your season. No on-board telemetry: the residual is derived under the FleetEdge physics model, and a sail plan is directional guidance until you sail it.
Pin. Map. Rank. Decompose. Plan.
For campaign leads and coaches racing a season-long circuit against a known set of rivals, who want the one thing the scoreboard can’t tell them: where does the gap actually live, and how much of it is ours to move?
- Pin — open the team workspace and pin the boats you race across the circuit: your standing cohort.
- Map — read the competitor-by-event grid: PPI for every rival at every event, where they lead and where they trail.
- Rank — stack-rank the field by PPI, then by the crew pillar alone, to see who is beating you on the boat versus on execution.
- Decompose — split your result and a rival’s into physics, fit, and crew — and find which pillar the gap lives in.
- Plan — pick the next event’s expected conditions and a target rival; get a directional sail plan for the band where your edge pays.
One design, four crews.
Three sister-ships took 1st, 2nd, and 4th in Class B at the 2025 ORC Worlds. A fourth — same hull, same rig, nearly the same rating — finished deep in the fleet. When the boat is held constant, what separates the winners?
This story is built from published race results. Your own diagnostic stays private to your team.
Tallinn, Class B — the natural experiment
Four Xr-41s inside a 12-boat comparison group (the product’s event cohort runs wider): the same 12.7-meter racer, four different crews, ratings within a handful of seconds per nautical mile. FleetEdge reads the whole cohort through one lens — what the design gave, what the crew earned.
The crew ladder is the finishing ladder
In the Study of this cohort (fleet view as of 1 July 2026), the four boats with negative crew residuals — FORMULA X, MABELLE II, DIXI 5, EXCITER — are exactly the top four finishers. FORMULA X’s −25.4 s/nm crew residual against DIXI 5’s −10.0 is the regatta, in one number. The product’s Headlines agree: FORMULA X leads Comp & Time and Crew across the event cohort.
FORMULA X — she won it on the water
The platform gave her nothing her sister-ships didn’t have: near-identical certificate ratings across the cluster. The Study attributes the win to the best crew residual in the cohort — −25.4 s/nm — on top of the best race delta (−14.6). The boat view carries the diagnostic behind that attribution.
The decomposition, behind the readout
The rated crew-weight margin the crew carries and the execution signal across the campaign’s eligible records — stated as bounded, not causal, with that line in frame.
The decomposition methodology is under on-site validation, and a crew-weight refinement is in flight in the physics model — readouts are directional and say so.
XBOX — same platform, deep in the fleet
The fourth Xr-41 is the experiment’s control: same hull, same rig family, a near-identical certificate rating — and a +37.1 s/nm crew residual in the Study that left her deep in the fleet. Across four identical platforms the finishing spread tracks the crew column, not the certificate. The +37.1 (positive = pace given away) is the versioned Study’s figure; the App’s crew-dimension decomposition of the same boat — a different estimator — tells the same story, last of the twelve.
Race by race, the story holds
Seven eligible comparison records sit behind the winner’s median delta — the diagnostic isn’t one race’s verdict, it’s the series’ shape.
What this page can and cannot claim.
· Figures quoted above are from the versioned FleetEdge Study of this cohort (fleet view as of 1 July 2026); screenshots carry their own as-of and are not asserted to be byte-equal to Study figures.
· Three of the cohort’s class-standings entries carry a known collection conflict in the archive; the crew-residual and race-delta columns are unaffected, and this page quotes no conflicted standing.
· Family labels reflect each frame’s published view; the taxonomy is vintage-aware and the App re-pinned mid-capture — captions state each frame’s cut.
· Hull-efficiency values are not quoted in this page’s text (they move with the fleet’s published view; the crew ladder does not depend on them) — captured App frames show the App’s live readouts.
The diagnostic builds on the FleetEdge crew and physics layer — how it works: Team Diagnostics, Crew & Execution, and The Physics.
A worked specimen boat view is included below: the specimen story →
Planned product · a real campaign, worked as the Team Diagnostic’s boat view — figures are cited to the versioned FleetEdge Study (fleet view as of 1 July 2026). The product is planned; the surface shown is the live method.
Xr-41 · X Yachts AEROSTREAM family Event: ORC Worlds 2025, Tallinn Private to your team
One campaign, decomposed
Tallinn handed the Team Diagnostic a natural experiment: four Xr-41 sister-ships in the same class, the same hull held constant four times over, so the crew layer stands isolated. This is the winner’s boat view — the campaign read as what the boat gave, what the conditions gave, and the crew-execution layer underneath the Class B title. For FORMULA X, the decomposition puts the win in the crew layer, not the rating; the figures live in the cards below, cited to the versioned Study.
Where it placed
On the record, FORMULA X won Class B at the 2025 ORC World Championship in Tallinn — the lead boat of the four-sister-ship Xr-41 cluster that took 1st, 2nd, and 4th in Class B with the same hull held constant. In the versioned Study (fleet view as of 1 July 2026), the win sits in the crew layer: a crew residual of −25.4 s/nm — best of the sister-ships (DIXI 5: −10.0) — on top of the best race delta, −14.6 s/nm, with near-identical certificate ratings across the sister-ships. Sister-ship XBOX (DEN 41) carried a crew residual of +37.1 s/nm and finished deep — the same hull, the opposite crew layer.
The full cohort read lives on the Team Diagnostic page.
The decomposition
One result read three ways, race by race, in sec/nm — what the boat gave, less what the weather gave, equals what the crew earned (negative = crew-earned pace).
Under on-site validation; readouts are directional while the run completes.
See it against your own work.
Scope: one boat — yours. No other team, federation, or public surface can see your view.