Separate the boat from the crew.
FleetEdge Team Diagnostic · Planned
Planned product · specimen: an anonymized campaign against its design-family peers. The product is planned; the method is FleetEdge’s live crew/boat decomposition.
Separate what the boat gave you from what the crew earned — a private diagnostic for your campaign.
For racing teams, tacticians, campaign managers, and coaches. Access by request.
Universe: one boat — yours Story: ORC Worlds 2025, Tallinn Private to your team
Scope: one boat — yours
Visible to: your team only — no other team, federation, or public surface can see this view
Access: by request — the product opens once your access is granted.
One design, four crews.
Three sister-ships took 1st, 2nd, and 4th in Class B at the 2025 ORC Worlds. A fourth — same hull, same rig, nearly the same rating — finished deep in the fleet. When the boat is held constant, what separates the winners?
This story is built from published race results. Your own diagnostic stays private to your team.
Tallinn, Class B — the natural experiment
Four Xr-41s inside a 12-boat comparison group (the product’s event cohort runs wider): the same 12.7-meter racer, four different crews, ratings within a handful of seconds per mile. FleetEdge reads the whole cohort through one lens — what the design gave, what the crew earned.
The crew ladder is the finishing ladder
In the Study of this cohort (fleet view as of 1 July 2026), the four boats with negative crew residuals — FORMULA X, MABELLE II, DIXI 5, EXCITER — are exactly the top four finishers. FORMULA X’s −25.4 s/nm crew residual against DIXI 5’s −10.0 is the regatta, in one number. The product’s Headlines agree: FORMULA X leads Comp & Time and Crew across the event cohort.
FORMULA X — she won it on the water
The platform gave her nothing her sister-ships didn’t have: GPH 552.0 against DIXI 5’s 545.9. The Study attributes the win to the best crew residual in the cohort — −25.4 s/nm — on top of the best race delta (−14.6). The boat view shows the diagnostic behind that attribution.
The decomposition, behind the readout
Rated versus solved crew weight, the margin the crew carries, and the execution signal across the campaign’s eligible records — stated as bounded, not causal, with the confidence line in frame.
The decomposition methodology is under on-site validation, and a crew-weight refinement is in flight in the physics model — readouts are directional and say so.
XBOX — same platform, deep in the fleet
The fourth Xr-41 is the experiment’s control: same hull, same rig family, GPH 549.4 — and a +37.1 s/nm crew residual in the Study that left her deep in the fleet. Across four identical platforms the finishing spread tracks the crew column, not the certificate.
Race by race, the story holds
Seven eligible comparison records sit behind the winner’s median delta — the diagnostic isn’t one race’s verdict, it’s the series’ shape.
What this page can and cannot claim.
· Figures quoted above are from the versioned FleetEdge Study of this cohort (fleet view as of 1 July 2026); screenshots carry their own as-of and are not asserted to be byte-equal to Study figures.
· Three of the cohort’s class-standings entries carry a known collection conflict in the archive; the crew-residual and race-delta columns are unaffected, and this page quotes no conflicted standing.
· Family labels reflect each frame’s published view; the taxonomy is vintage-aware and the App re-pinned mid-capture — captions state each frame’s cut.
· Hull-efficiency values are not quoted anywhere on this page (pending physics release; the crew ladder does not depend on it).
The diagnostic builds on the FleetEdge crew and physics layer — how it works: Team Diagnostics, Crew Intelligence, and The Physics.
A worked specimen boat view remains available: the anonymized specimen diagnostic boat page →
See it against your own work.
Scope: one boat — yours. No other team, federation, or public surface can see your view.