The season, reviewed.

The season review in the questions a rating officer actually asks — which boats, which designs won, whether the boats or the crews made the difference, what happened at the events — and at the end, the report for the board, issued with a number and a date.

For ORC class associations and national authorities. Access by request.

Scope: the nation’s certificated boats, wherever they race Story: Italy’s published record, the demonstration Private to your federation

The season at a glance.

You arrive on the season line: the published record, the federation’s own races, the certificate each boat holds now, and the date of the publication you are reading. The rail carries the nine questions of the season review and two doors — After a race and Make the report. A review lives in the address and in your browser across visits; the charts you keep hold what you saw, never a live re-draw. One press narrows the whole fleet to the boats you mean.

Which boats are we talking about?

Before any share, an officer needs the population. The dashboard answers rung by rung: the boats that hold a certificate from the federation; the ones with a result on record at one of its own races; the ones with a finishing place; the ones whose pace against the rating can be read, and read well. Each rung is a count from the published results and a door to its boats. The two rungs the published record cannot yet support say so, in the record’s own words, instead of pretending.

Which designs won?

Grouped by archetype (one of the fleet’s eight recurring design types), the podium is read the way an authority should read it: each group’s share of the podium beside its share of the fleet. Equal shares are the neutral baseline; the deviation is the read. A row opens the boats behind the count, and the share stays the read. Other groupings — design class, overall length — are one press away; the ones the published record cannot yet support say what they wait on.

Did the boats or the crews make the difference?

Within each archetype, the boats’ pace against their rating over the season, averaged and shown at the floor — a group with too few boats is counted, never listed. Faster than rated sits to one side, slower to the other. The dashboard’s own words stand under the read: a pace against the rating names no crew, no helm and no fault. So when an archetype takes more than its share of the podium, part of that is the boats and part is how they were sailed — the dashboard says which; it never says who.

What happened at the events?

Three lists, and the honesty between them. The season is the federation’s own races as the published record attributes them, newest first, the basis beside each row — by venue, or by the organizer’s register — with our boats, their places and the races counted per event. Our boats abroad, attributed to another federation, are listed apart, outside the season. And the events the record has not yet attributed to any federation are withheld from the season until it does, and shown — a gap the dashboard names rather than papers over. Each row is a door to its event.

What is the story — and what speaks against it?

The review closes the way a good committee paper does. What is the story? The read the season supports, in the officer’s own words, with the charts kept as they stood. What speaks against the story? The reads the officer marked as speaking against it ride alongside, never dropped. What will we do? The follow-ups kept during the season — each with the reason it was kept — become the actions. The report for the board is issued with a number and a date, prints as one document at A4 and Letter, and travels as a package that carries its own content hash, so the version in the room is the version on record.

Which event just finished?

The second door. Pick the event that just finished from the same three lists — the season by basis, our boats abroad, and the not yet attributed — narrowed by name if you know it. Behind the door: our boats and how they placed, whether the kind of boat explains it, and two boats side by side.

An event page: our boats, and whether the kind of boat explains it.

The event’s lead line carries the published record’s own words — the dates, the entries, how many of ours, how many with a finishing place, the races published — and the basis on which the record attributes it to the federation. Beneath, our boats at this event and how each placed, beside her pace against the rating over the season. The pace at this one event is not published yet, and the page says so rather than guessing.

Then the officer’s question at this event: does the kind of boat explain who won here? The podium places our boats won, by archetype, beside each group’s share of our boats at the event and its read across the season — more than its share, about its share, less. The season’s pace read sits beneath, and the same sentence closes it: part is the boats and part is how they were sailed. Each read can be kept — supports the story, speaks against it, or we can’t count this.

And the door back to the review: what will you do about it? A follow-up is kept with its reason first — a result caught my eye, an event just finished, something doesn’t match a certificate, an owner or a measurer asked, the committee referred it — and rides into the report’s what will we do. Just looking keeps nothing.

What the races say.

The dashboard’s other tab reads the same fleet boat by boat — how the fleet breaks down, the headlines, the map, what the races say, the ranking. One read from it here: an event opened race by race, each race with its wind and current beside how each archetype fared in it — the read an officer wants when a member says the conditions decided the regatta.

The season review, and the report.

Aggregate views only, on data FleetEdge already publishes — the certificate each boat holds now and the published results. There is no blended score: you read the questions in order and keep what you saw.

Built on the FleetEdge platform’s shared core, reading the published record at fleet level. The dashboard’s own faces run at zero accessibility violations under axe at four viewport classes, and the season report prints as one document at A4 and Letter.

Arrive. Ask. Keep. Report.

For national rating offices and class authorities — the officials lane — who arrive with a season of results and a recurring question from their members: was it fair?

Italy’s published record, as the binding shown.

Every screen above is the dashboard on Italy’s published record: a 1,769-boat national fleet on the site’s published Italy page, the certificate each boat holds now, and the federation’s own races as the record attributes them. No federation is a customer yet; Italy is the demonstration binding. Your federation’s own dashboard stays private to your federation.