The 2025 Garmin ORC World Championship brought 64 boats to the Adriatic for 21 races across three days of racing in conditions ranging from 8 to 22 knots. It was the largest single-event dataset in FleetEdge's analytical pipeline — and the first major test of the archetype framework at world championship level.

When you apply FleetEdge's 31-feature analysis to this fleet, every boat receives an archetype assignment based on its ORC certificate data and SailEdge physics analysis.

The resulting archetype map reveals the structural diversity of a world championship fleet — and whether ORC's rating system is delivering on its founding promise of fair racing across different design strategies.

How the fleet distributed.

64
boats entered
21
races completed
11
archetypes represented
8–22 kn
wind range
Global corpus · as of 2026-04-21 · build a2e90234

AEROMAX

Pure Upwind Power
At Worlds 12 boats

IRONWIND

Strength Under Load
At Worlds 14 boats

GLIDEFORM

Downwind Flow Speed
At Worlds 7 boats

Four archetypes in the top five.

When you examine the corrected-time standings after 21 races, the top five finishers came from four different archetypes. An AEROMAX boat won overall. An IRONWIND boat finished second. Third place went to a STORMLINE design, and the fourth and fifth positions were split between KEELFLEX and AEROMAX boats.

This is significant. If ORC's rating system were systematically favouring one design strategy over others, you would expect the top finishers to cluster in a single archetype.

Instead, the results confirm that boats with fundamentally different structural strategies — rig-powered upwind specialists, stiff platform workhorses, big-rig reaching-strong platforms rewarded by flat sailing, and balance-dependent boats — can all compete at the highest level. The rating is working. The difference is the crew.

Position Band AEROMAX IRONWIND STORMLINE KEELFLEX Other
1st–5th 2 1 1 1 0
6th–15th 3 3 1 1 2
16th–30th 4 5 2 2 2
31st–64th 3 5 4 7 15

Archetype distribution by corrected-time finishing position band. 2025 Garmin ORC World Championship, 64 boats, 21 races.

What the crew residual reveals.

When you apply FleetEdge's dimensional decomposition to this fleet, the crew residual signal becomes visible. The AEROMAX boat that won overall outperformed its dimensional profile most significantly in upwind VMG — the crew extracted more from the rig than the physics predicted across this regatta's beats.

The second-place IRONWIND boat showed its strongest residual on the run legs. That is an observation from this regatta on this boat, not a prediction from archetype membership: PPI decomposes residuals per boat per race, and this crew's downwind execution is what the residual surfaced.

Different boats, different residual signatures — and at the top of the leaderboard, four different structural archetypes. The rating placed them on equal footing. The crews built the difference.

The crew residual analysis presented here draws on FleetEdge's validated methodology applied to the 2025 ORC Worlds dataset. Crew performance residual measurement is live across the fleet for boats with race results. The dimensional decomposition and archetype assignments shown above are production capabilities available today.

Every race adds signal.

FleetEdge turns race results into dimensional intelligence — one event at a time.